We must campaign to increase the bereavement award in England and Wales

I recently settled a fatal accident claim involving a child and I recall the moment when I first advised the parents of the level of bereavement damages they would recover. They were, understandably, extremely traumatised by the tragic loss of their young child who was killed in a road traffic accident in their presence, but to be told they would recover only a few thousands of pounds compensation, ÂŁ11,800 to be precise, was highly insulting. It was one of the most difficult meetings I attended.
The parents and other family members are all bringing claims for psychiatric injury in their own right, but they wanted an explanation on how the bereavement award could possibly be so low. They lost a child! It was set by statute, I informed them. It will not compensate them for this loss, no amount of money could.
There has quite rightly been much media coverage of the low level of bereavement damages awarded to English claimants compared with those in other jurisdictions. A few of my colleagues have in the past blogged about the unfairness in the English legal system both in terms of the narrow category of people who are eligible to make such claims and also the paltry award fixed by statute.
We must all push for change and support organisations such as the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) in their campaign in every way we can to force parliamentary reform of the current level of bereavement award in England and Wales. Only then can we avoid such difficult meetings with clients being more painful than they need to be.
Please note
The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, expressed or implied.
Our Latest Injury & Medical Claims Insights
- May 12, 2025
The Electronic Patient Record And Clinical Negligence Claims
- April 2, 2025
MJF V University Hospitals Birmingham [2024] – The “Holmesian Fallacy” And The Limits Of A Put To Proof Defence
- March 31, 2025
Pre-Existing Conditions in Psychiatric Personal Injury Claims
- March 26, 2025
Riding the Risk: Micromobility in Personal Injury
- March 18, 2025
The importance of support throughout the life of a claim
- February 19, 2025
Alternative Dispute Resolution in Litigation
Latest Articles
View allContact us today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the commercial
& civil Dispute team today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Wills, Trusts
& Estates team today
Contact the Court of
Protection team today
Contact the Employment Law team today
Contact the Clinical Negligence team today
Contact the Family & Relationships team today
Contact the Personal Injury Claims team today
Contact the leasehold & Freehold team today
Contact the Corporate & Commercial team today
Contact the housing & disputes team
"*" indicates required fields