Giving a tenant notice on buying a property

It is not uncommon to buy property with a tenant already in place. Sometimes this is part of the package and the certainty of income each month is part of what the new landlord is buying. On other occasions the intention is to ask that tenant to leave so that the land can be used by the new owner themselves or for works carried out at the site. This situation leads the new owner to ask when they can give notice. Is it once offers have been exchanged, the sale has completed, or some other point?
This issue came up in the last fortnight in the case of Stodday Land v Pye. While this case concerns agricultural land it makes points which are of general importance in this question. Stodday owned land of which Pye was an agricultural tenant. It sold most of the land to a new owner on 19 June 2013 but it was not formally registered by the Land Registry until 16 July 2013. During that period Stodday and the new owners sent Mr Pye notices to quit in respect of the plots they now saw themselves as owning.
These notices to quit were found to be invalid both at first instance and on appeal by the High Court. The normal position at common law is that a beneficial ownership is not a sufficient right in land to give notice to a tenant, you must be a legal owner. You cannot be a legal owner until the full legal formalities, including registration with the Land Registry have been complied with. Therefore until full registration of the land occurs the new owner cannot serve notices.
Despite efforts to argue around this position and an assertion that the classic common law position did not fit well with the current concerns the High Court stuck to the classical position firmly. Therefore the registration gap, as it is known, will continue.
Purchasers should be considering their needs when buying property which is tenanted. If they are going to want access to the site more rapidly it would be better to agree that the vendor serves notices if possible or they will need to allow for the delays caused by registration in their planning.
* Disclaimer: The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, express or implied.*
Please note
The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, expressed or implied.
Our Latest Housing & Property Disputes Insights
- April 7, 2025
Retrofit works: Can I make my landlord retrofit my council home?
- February 13, 2025
RRO Reforms under the new Renters’ Rights Bill
- January 10, 2025
The Renters’ Rights Bill Explained: Key Provisions and Implications for Renters and Landlords
- December 23, 2024
Court of Appeal Decision in Martyna Switaj v Adrian McClenaghan – Can a valid section 21 notice be served if prohibited fees under the Tenant Fees Act 2019 have been taken prior to 1 June 2019?
- November 20, 2024
Trading Standards Penalty for Novation Fee Quashed on Appeal
- October 10, 2024
Terminating Licences to Occupy Residential Property: A Legal Guide
Latest Articles
View allContact us today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the commercial
& civil Dispute team today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Wills, Trusts
& Estates team today
Contact the Court of
Protection team today
Contact the Employment Law team today
Contact the Clinical Negligence team today
Contact the Family & Relationships team today
Contact the Personal Injury Claims team today
Contact the leasehold & Freehold team today
Contact the Corporate & Commercial team today
Contact the housing & disputes team
"*" indicates required fields