Compensation for child neglect

It has been reported that there is a danger of child neglect cases being underestimated.
I recently settled a claim (subject to the court’s approval) for two siblings who suffered significant neglect at the hands of their parents.
I was instructed by the Official Solicitor to the Senior Court on behalf of the children to pursue claims against the social services. The children had sustained psychological injuries following social services’ failure to protect them from the neglect they suffered at the family home while living with their parents.
Social services first became involved with this family in 1987. Both the Child Protection Unit and the health visitor expressed concerns to them about the children’s two elder siblings. It appears that little or no action was taken and social services seem to have repeatedly closed their files.
The first child was four years old before he came to the attention of social services following a referral from the health visitor in May 1998. The information provided by the health visitor, school staff and social services’ own case records should have alerted social workers to the fact that my client was a child in need and at possible risk of harm. Social services persistently failed to act in response to the parents’ lack of engagement with both children for almost six years, despite much evidence to suggest that they were at risk of suffering due to the lack of care being provided to them. Neither child was considered to display age appropriate behaviour.
Both children were eventually removed from their parents’ care and placed with supportive foster carers.
I pursued civil claims on behalf of the claimants and obtained medical reports from a consultant adolescent psychiatrist. He concluded that both children had behavioural difficulties caused in part by the neglect they had suffered.
I issued court proceedings against the local authority on the basis that their social services had failed to protect the children from harm and had caused them to suffer psychological injuries. The local authority has now agreed to settle both claims subject to the approval of the court.
*Disclaimer: The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, express or implied.*
Please note
The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, expressed or implied.
Our Latest Injury & Medical Claims Insights
- April 2, 2025
MJF V University Hospitals Birmingham [2024] – The “Holmesian Fallacy” And The Limits Of A Put To Proof Defence
- March 31, 2025
Pre-Existing Conditions in Psychiatric Personal Injury Claims
- March 26, 2025
Riding the Risk: Micromobility in Personal Injury
- March 18, 2025
The importance of support throughout the life of a claim
- February 19, 2025
Alternative Dispute Resolution in Litigation
- February 12, 2025
What does naming judges have to do with vulnerable claimants?
Latest Articles
View allContact us today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the commercial
& civil Dispute team today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Wills, Trusts
& Estates team today
Contact the Court of
Protection team today
Contact the Employment Law team today
Contact the Clinical Negligence team today
Contact the Family & Relationships team today
Contact the Personal Injury Claims team today
Contact the leasehold & Freehold team today
Contact the Corporate & Commercial team today
Contact the housing & disputes team
"*" indicates required fields