Anthony Gold

Get in touch

020 7940 4060

  • People
  • Insights
  • What to Expect
  • Contact Us
Anthony Gold
  • Services
    • Housing And Property Disputes
      • Property Disputes
      • Leasehold Services
      • Services For Commercial Landlords, Tenants And Agents
      • Services For Residential Landlords And Agents
      • Housing And Tenancy Issues
      • Judicial Review
    • Injury And Medical Claims
      • Life Changing Injuries
      • Medical Claims
      • Personal Injury
      • Child Abuse
    • Family And Relationships
      • Starting Relationships
      • Ending Relationships
      • After Relationships End
      • Useful Contacts
      • Religious & Cultural Issues
      • Family Law FAQs
      • Family Dispute Resolution
      • Modern Families And Surrogacy Arrangements
    • Conveyancing, Property & Business Services
      • Business Agreements
      • Business Disagreements
      • Commercial Property
      • Commercial Property Disputes
      • Leasehold Services
      • Residential Property
    • Wills, Estates & Court Of Protection
      • Wills, Trusts And Estates
      • Claims Against Trusts And Estates
      • Capacity And Court Of Protection
    • Dispute Resolution & Employment Law
      • Personal Claims
      • Professional Negligence
      • Business Disagreements
      • Claims Against Trusts And Estates
      • Employment
    • People
    • Insights
    • What to Expect
    • Contact Us
  • Get in touch

    020 7940 4060

  • Housing and Property Disputes
  • Injury and Medical Claims
  • Family and Relationships
  • Conveyancing, Property & Business Services
  • Wills, Estates & Court of Protection
  • Dispute Resolution & Employment Law
  • Property disputes
  • Ownership disputes and shares in property
  • Challenging the decisions of councils and public bodies
  • Rights of way, boundaries, covenants and easements
  • Party wall disputes
  • Leasehold services
  • Lease extension
  • Collective enfranchisement
  • Service charge disputes
  • Repairs to leaseholds
  • Right to manage
  • Services for commercial landlords, tenants and agents
  • Breach of covenant
  • Forfeiture and recovery of possession
  • Dilapidations and failing to repair
  • Lease renewals
  • Services for residential landlords and agents
  • Regulatory issues
  • Repossession
  • Agents (including letting agreements)
  • Housing and tenancy issues
  • Repairs
  • Repossession and eviction
  • Rehousing and homelessness
  • Judicial review
  • Life changing injuries
  • Brain injury
  • Spinal cord injury
  • Amputation
  • Psychiatric injury
  • Fatal injuries and inquests
  • Medical claims
  • Surgical claims
  • Non-Surgical Claims
  • Birth injury
  • Child health and paediatrics
  • GP and primary care treatment
  • Private healthcare
  • Personal injury
  • Road traffic accidents
  • Accidents abroad
  • Accidents at work
  • Faulty products
  • Public liability and other accidents
  • Child abuse
  • Child abuse
  • Starting relationships
  • Pre nuptial agreements
  • Pre civil partnership and same sex relationship agreements
  • Cohabitation and living together agreements
  • Property ownership agreements
  • Ending relationships
  • Divorce and separation
  • Ending a civil partnership
  • Ending cohabitation
  • Agreeing child arrangements
  • Agreeing finance and assets
  • International arrangements
  • After relationships end
  • Abduction and leave to remove children
  • Changing and challenging parenting agreements
  • Changing and challenging financial agreements
  • Grandparents’ rights
  • Useful Contacts
  • Financial planners
  • Referral to Pension Actuaries and Pension on Divorce Experts (PODEs)
  • Tax Specialists
  • Financial Neutrals
  • Counselling
  • Conveyancing
  • Wills
  • Religious & cultural issues
  • Jewish family law
  • Islamic family law
  • Family Law FAQs
  • Children FAQs
  • Cohabitation Agreement FAQs
  • No-Fault Divorce and Separation FAQs
  • Financial Issues FAQs
  • Pre-Marital Contracts FAQs
  • Family Dispute Resolution
  • Roundtable Meetings
  • One Solicitor Solution
  • Mediation
  • Collaborative Practice
  • Arbitration
  • Second Opinions
  • Private FDR’s
  • Early Neutral Evaluation (‘ENE’)
  • Modern Families and Surrogacy Arrangements
  • Domestic Surrogacy
  • International Surrogacy
  • Business agreements
  • Business advice
  • Employment
  • Mergers and acquisitions
  • Supplier contracts
  • Business disagreements
  • Commercial property
  • Commercial Sale and Purchases
  • Commercial loans and mortgages
  • Property Investment: plot developers & plot buyers
  • Auction: sales and purchases
  • Commercial advice for landlords and tenants
  • Planning advice
  • Mortgage debentures and securities
  • Commercial property disputes
  • Breach of covenant
  • Dilapidations and failing to repair
  • Forfeiture and recovery of possession
  • Lease renewals
  • Leasehold services
  • Lease extension
  • Collective enfranchisement
  • Service charge disputes
  • Repairs to leaseholds
  • Right to manage
  • Residential property
  • Residential Sale and Purchases
  • Property Investment: plot developers & plot buyers
  • Remortgages
  • Auction: sales and purchases
  • Ownership matters and transfers
  • Wills, trusts and estates
  • Making a will
  • Applying for probate
  • Distributing the estate
  • Arranging lasting power of attorney
  • Trust advice
  • Tax planning and advice
  • Claims against trusts and estates
  • Contesting a will
  • Losses caused by trustees
  • Capacity and court of protection
  • Appointing a deputy
  • Removing a deputy
  • Arranging lasting power of attorney
  • Gifts and legacies
  • Managing assets under a deputyship
  • Care issues
  • Removing lasting and enduring power of attorney
  • Special educational needs
  • Capacity and court of protection
  • Personal claims
  • Debt recovery
  • Ownership disputes and shares in property
  • Civil and commercial mediation
  • Building disputes
  • Professional negligence
  • Professional Negligence
  • Property Fraud
  • Investment Fraud
  • Business disagreements
  • Building disputes
  • Civil and commercial mediation
  • Claims against directors
  • Contract disputes
  • Debt recovery
  • Directors personal liabilities
  • Employment
  • Professional negligence
  • Claims against trusts and estates
  • Contesting a will
  • Losses caused by trustees
  • Employment
  • Employment
  • Unfair or Wrongful Dismissal
  • Settlement Agreements
Anthony Gold > Blog > Tribunal Judge: special reasons needed to justify tenant fees higher than £50

Robin Stewart

robin.stewart@anthonygold.co.uk

Share
  • September 28, 2021
  • Blog
  • By  Robin Stewart 
  • 0 comments

Tribunal Judge: special reasons needed to justify tenant fees higher than £50


What is a reasonable fee for a letting agent to charge for arranging the variation, assignment or novation of a tenancy?

In England the Tenant Fees Act 2019 regulates the charges which landlords and letting agents may impose on residential tenants. Most fees are banned, but in limited circumstances it is permissible to charge tenants ‘reasonable costs’. Previously I have discussed the difficulties in establishing what is a reasonable fee on the Anthony Gold blog.

A fee for ‘novation’ of a tenancy

In a recent First-tier Tribunal decision, Judge Professor Richard Percival interpreted the rules regarding reasonable costs in an interesting way – with a result that will benefit tenants if his approach is adopted by other judges.

The case concerned a charge of £393.54 imposed by letting agents on a tenant who wished to be replaced. Judge Percival described this as “an ordinary, run of the mill example of tenant churn in shared rented housing”. (This use of the word ‘churn’ appears to have established itself in the housing law lexicon after it was used in the same way by His Honour Judge Luba QC in Sturgis v Boddy earlier in the year). The tenant argued that the fee was excessive, while the agent argued that the sum was reasonable compensation for the work done. The total fees were broken down by the agent as follows:

Referencing the new tenant: £23.94

Inspection £58.80

Creating new tenancy agreement £274.80

Re-registration of deposits £36

As evidence to support the charges the agent provided an itemised list of tasks they had performed: “issuing replacement guidelines to the landlord and tenants, negotiating certain matters with the landlord, collecting rent and the deposit from the new tenant and providing advice and assistance on the return of the Applicant’s deposit.”

However, rather than assess the time taken and hourly rate charged by the agents (which is how an assessment of reasonable legal costs or service charges would be carried out), Judge Percival held that where the Tenant Fees Act allows a charge the higher of £50 or “reasonable costs”, weight should be given to the “determinate sum” of £50 specified by Parliament, and that this sum should ordinarily be the most that is charged to tenants:

“The better approach, then, is that, to escape the £50 upper limit, a landlord or letting agent must show that there is some proper particular consideration or reason for the Tribunal to conclude that £50 should not be considered a reasonable limit. This need not be something truly exceptional, but the landlord or letting agent must be able to point to something that makes the charge at least somewhat out of the ordinary run of similar transactions.”

The judge supports this conclusion by drawing on the Government’s guidance. As noted in the Tribunal’s decision, this guidance is not authoritative in its interpretation of the law, and I suspect other courts and tribunals might be more reluctant to rely on it as a guide to interpreting the text of the Act. The starting point is the meaning the text of the legislation, not what the government say it means.

This is only a First-tier Tribunal decision and does not create any binding legal precedent. Ordinarily legal commentators tend not to write about non-binding first-instances cases like this, but I think this is an interesting and important decision because the Tenant Fees Act was hugely significant change for the private rented sector, and there has been relatively little litigation about it. If this interpretation of Schedule 1 Tenant Fees Act is adopted more widely this would be a significant boost to tenants.

Novation or early termination?

One other interesting feature of this case is that all parties, including the Tribunal, treated the case as a ‘novation’ of the tenancy, and applied those rules. Novation is not defined in the Act, but the glossary published with Government guidance on the Act defined it as “different from assignment, [as] it involves the creation of a new contract and requiring consent of all parties.”.

The facts described in the Tribunal’s decision do fit a novation, but it would also be possible to characterise the ‘churn’ of replacing a tenant as a ‘early termination of the tenancy at the tenant’s request’ – the replacement of the outgoing tenant takes effect as a surrender of the old tenancy and the grant of a new tenancy to someone else, and that is an early termination of the original tenancy at the tenant’s request. The charges which the Tenant Fees Act permits for an early termination are subtly different from those for a novation – agents are restricted to ‘reasonable costs’, but landlords are allowed to claim the “loss suffered <…> as a result of the termination of the tenancy”. There is no mention of reasonableness in this context, and no £50 “determinate sum”.

This raises some questions which I will not attempt to answer here: firstly, if the facts of the case fit either ‘novation’ or ‘early termination’, which rules should apply? And secondly, does the absence of any defined £50 sum for early termination cases support or undermine Judge Percival’s concept of the ‘determinate sum’?

There have been relatively few tenant fees cases in the Tribunal, and no reported appeals decisions. This means that lots of important questions about how the Act operates are still open to debate.

*Disclaimer: The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, express or implied.*

Robin Stewart

robin.stewart@anthonygold.co.uk

Get in touch

Call, email or use a contact form – whichever suits you. We’ll let you know the best person to help you get started.

Call or Email

020 7940 4060

mail@anthonygold.co.uk

No comments

Add your comment

We need your name and email address to make sure you’re a real person. We won’t share your email address with anyone else or send you spam. Please complete fields marked with *.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

code

Related Services

  • Ownership disputes and shares in property

  • Breach of covenant

  • Challenging the decisions of councils and public bodies

  • Dilapidations and failing to repair

  • Forfeiture and recovery of possession

  • Ownership disputes and shares in property

  • Party wall disputes

  • Planning advice

  • Public liability and other accidents

  • Repossession and eviction

About the author

  • Robin Stewart

Meet the team

  • Housing and Property Disputes

You might also like...

  • Housing Update - Issue 9

  • HMO law in practice: Unmarried partners in shared accommodation

  • Property litigation in the criminal courts: Parker v Financial Conduct Authority & Anor [2021] EWCA Crim 956

Contact Us

Request a Call Back

About Us

  • Accessibility
  • Compliance
  • Responsible Business
  • Equality & Diversity
  • History
  • Our Beliefs
  • List of LLP members

Careers

  • Trainee Solicitors
  • Vacancies

Social Media

  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • View our YouTube channel

Online Payments

  • Payment page through Worldpay

Accredited by

Lexel Parctice
76000Award

Copyright © Anthony Gold Solicitors LLP. All rights reserved. Anthony Gold Solicitors LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC433560 and is authorised and regulated by the by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration Number 810601