People Insights
Contact Us
Get in touch
Contact Us
Published On: March 24, 2017 | Blog | 0 comments

ILOTT v MITSON: The outcome for charities

Ilott v Mitson [2017] UKSC 17 has been described as upholding the supremacy of testamentary freedom, and as being a win for charities.  What does this mean and is it true?

The facts of Ilott v Mitson have been described here and are briefly as follows:

Ms Ilott was the daughter of Melita Jackson.  Her father died before she was born.  Aged 17, Ms Ilott moved out of home to live with a boyfriend Mrs Jackson did not like, and that led to a lifetime estrangement.  Ms Ilott went on to marry her boyfriend and they had 5 children. Three attempts were made at reconciliation between mother and daughter, but none were successful.  Mrs Jackson did not support her daughter financially, and her daughter did not expect to inherit anything from her estate.  On her death, Mrs Jackson left everything to three animal charities which she had not previously had any connection with.

Ms Ilott and her family were not well off, and relied on state benefits for approximately 75% of their income.  Ms Ilott made a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 for reasonable financial provision from the estate of her late mother.  She was initially awarded £50,000, but (after a series of appeals) this was increased by the Court of  Appeal to £143,000 (for her to buy her Housing Association house) and £20,000 for other financial needs.  The charities appealed to the Supreme Court to have this decision overturned.

The Supreme Court found that, on the facts, there were three orders which could have been made:

  1. The original order of £50,000 ;
  2. The Court of Appeal order of £143,000 plus £20,000 cash;
  3. Dismissal of the claim, so that Ms Ilott received nothing.

The Judges felt that any of those orders could be justified (although it should be noted that by the time the matter came before the Supreme Court, option 3 was not available to them).  They plumped for option 1 – overturning the decision of the Court of Appeal which had given a far higher award.

The reason that this is significant is because Mrs Jackson had chosen to leave her money to charities which she had not had a close association.  Charities in these circumstances are used to facing the argument that this is essentially a windfall, and that the family of the testator deserves greater consideration.  However, the Supreme Court emphasised that leaving money to charity is something which any testator is free to do.   Whilst charities cannot have an expectation of a bequest, they do rely on legacy income for their work and this should not be readily dismissed.  It can be easy to forget that the making an award to a Claimant under the Inheritance Act automatically reduces the amounts payable to the testators chosen beneficiaries, whether these are family, friends or charities.  This decision is likely to make it easier for charities to defend bequests left to them from Claimants, particularly where the Claimant has no strong moral claim.

When making an award under the Inheritance Act, the Court has to consider whether the will makes ‘reasonable financial provision’ for the applicant, and not whether the testator acted reasonably.  In this case, the testator does not appear to have acted reasonably – but that does not mean that reasonable financial provision was not made.  Ms Ilott was not financially dependent on her mother – she had lived independently for decades, and had not expected to inherit anything.

This judgment has re-emphasised the importance of testamentary freedom.  In England and Wales (unlike many other jurisdictions) there is no form of forced heirship – people can leave their estate entirely as they wish even if that means disinheriting their family entirely for totally unfair reasons.  Whilst the Inheritance Act provides a means for a small number of people to make claims against the estate, Ilott has reiterated that the circumstances in which they can do this are very limited and the testators wishes should be given serious consideration in any such case.

* Disclaimer: The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, express or implied.*
  • A compassionate solicitor who considers all of her client’s concerns, and advises on the best way to resolve them, in or out of court.
  • Achieves settlements which are suitable for the individual circumstances incorporating compensation payments, the transfer of property and setting up trusts for children.
  • Completed the ACTAPS (Association of Contentious Trust and Probate Specialists) Contentious Trusts and Probate course – the only specialist training course for this area of law.
  • Qualified Commercial and Civil Mediator, accredited by the ADR Group.
  • Recommended in The Legal 500 ‘Clare Kelly is exceptionally knowledgeable and extremely efficient, and is a good negotiator who is sensitive to her clients’ needs and finds practical solutions’
  • ‘has a great eye for detail but can also identify the crux of the dispute’ – Legal 500 2019
  • Recommended by clients:
    “[Clare] has been absolutely wonderful – so lovely, extremely bright, and a rock when it came to getting us through the last two years.”
    “Clare, you are a star of the highest order!!”
    “It has been a difficult and stressful case and you have dealt with it efficiently and skilfully and with warmth and sensitivity”.
    “Your skill, your expertise, in matters concerning Wills is I believe, second to none. Both myself and my wife will be forever in your debt….Saying thank you just doesn’t cover the gratitude and respect we both have for you.”


Get in touch

Call, email or use a contact form – whichever suits you. We’ll let you know the best person to help you get started.

Call or Email

020 7940 4060

No comments

Add your comment

We need your name and email address to make sure you’re a real person. We won’t share your email address with anyone else or send you spam. Please complete fields marked with *.

Leave a Reply

Your email address and phone number will not be published on the website. Other visitors will not be able to see your contact information. Required fields are marked *

Contact Us

How can we help?

Request a Call Back

How can we help?