People Insights
Contact Us
Get in touch
Contact Us
Published On: September 11, 2018 | Blog | 0 comments

Can you Challenge a Will where the Deceased did not know what he was signing?

It is possible to challenge a will when it is not clear whether the deceased either did not know of the contents of the will, or did not approve them even if they have signed the will.  This can be done even where the testator had mental capacity to make the will (and could have understood the contents).  However, where the testator had capacity and the will has been properly executed, it will be presumed that they knew and approved of the contents.

In order to challenge a will on these grounds, the challenger has to demonstrate to the Court that there are suspicious circumstances surrounding the making of the will.  Once they have shown that, then the person who wants to rely on the will has to prove that the deceased did know and approve of the contents of their will.

It is difficult to say exactly what will excite the suspicion of the Court, but the following are likely to:

– A will which is in English where the deceased was not fluent in the language and where there is no indication that it was translated;

– A will signed by someone who was unable to hold a pen easily (for example because they were in hospital);

– A deathbed will which substantially changes the provision made – particularly if this was made in favour of someone who was with the deceased at the end;

– A will which one or both of the witnesses say they did not sign;

– A will signed by someone who had sight difficulties where there is no indication that the will was read out to them.

– A will prepared by someone who stands to inherit something from it.

There are also circumstances which are unlikely to excite the suspicion of the Court:

– A will which is drafted by a family member who is also a solicitor and who has been in the habit of advising the deceased;

– A will which is signed by someone who has sight difficulties but who can see with help.

The High Court considered this issue in the matter of King v King [2014] EWHC 2827 (Ch).  In that case, Mr King changed his will in 2005, leaving everything to his two sons from his first marriage rather than to his wife (as had been the case previously).  They had cohabited from the 1960s, but married only shortly before the will was made.  Mr King provided that she could live in their home (which was in his sole name) for life.

Mrs King challenged the will, on the grounds that her husband did not know and approve of the contents. Her arguments were based on two main grounds:

1. He has sight problems and could not have read the will, and there was no indication that it had been read over to him – this was not a strong argument because she herself admitted that he could read documents with the aid of a magnifying glass, and the fact that the will did not record that it had been read over did not mean that it had not been; 2. The will had been prepared by a relative of Mr King – this was an unsuccessful argument because the relative was a lawyer who was used to advising Mr King, and who did not take any benefit under the will himself.

The judge in this case decided that these were not circumstances which would arouse the suspicion of the Court, and the will was therefore upheld.

For advice on challenging a will, or defending a challenge to a will, please contact a member of our contentious probate team.

Disclaimer: The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, express or implied.
  • A compassionate solicitor who considers all of her client’s concerns, and advises on the best way to resolve them, in or out of court.
  • Achieves settlements which are suitable for the individual circumstances incorporating compensation payments, the transfer of property and setting up trusts for children.
  • Completed the ACTAPS (Association of Contentious Trust and Probate Specialists) Contentious Trusts and Probate course – the only specialist training course for this area of law.
  • Qualified Commercial and Civil Mediator, accredited by the ADR Group.
  • Recommended in The Legal 500 ‘Clare Kelly is exceptionally knowledgeable and extremely efficient, and is a good negotiator who is sensitive to her clients’ needs and finds practical solutions’
  • ‘has a great eye for detail but can also identify the crux of the dispute’ – Legal 500 2019
  • Recommended by clients:
    “[Clare] has been absolutely wonderful – so lovely, extremely bright, and a rock when it came to getting us through the last two years.”
    “Clare, you are a star of the highest order!!”
    “It has been a difficult and stressful case and you have dealt with it efficiently and skilfully and with warmth and sensitivity”.
    “Your skill, your expertise, in matters concerning Wills is I believe, second to none. Both myself and my wife will be forever in your debt….Saying thank you just doesn’t cover the gratitude and respect we both have for you.”


Get in touch

Call, email or use a contact form – whichever suits you. We’ll let you know the best person to help you get started.

Call or Email

020 7940 4060

Contact Us

How can we help?

Request a Call Back

How can we help?