People Insights
Contact Us
Get in touch
Contact Us
Published On: November 22, 2017 | Blog | 0 comments

Aviva Insurance Ltd v Aleksandar Kovacic: Video Surveillance and Contempt of Court

It is well known that surveillance evidence is frequently used by insurers in some injury claims. The aim is to show any difference between the alleged level of impairment/injury and the truth.

There are several consequences to the successful deployment of surveillance evidence that results in the discontinuance or settlement of claims, including: costs sanctions and the potential for contempt of court proceedings (pursuant to rule 32.14 of the Civil Procedure Rules which provides that “Proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against a person if he makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth”).

The case of AVIVA INSURANCE LTD v ALEKSANDAR KOVACIC [2017] EWHC 2772 (QB) serves as a stark reminder that the insurers may take proceedings against a claimant for contempt of court in cases where video surveillance shows that they have made a false statement.

In this case the defendant in the contempt proceedings (who had the claimant in the injury claim) had sustained severe injuries in a road traffic accident in 2010. Liability was admitted, and in 2013 the claim was pleaded in excess of £1 million. The defendant maintained that he continued to struggle with a number of daily activities because of his injuries. However, the insurer obtained video surveillance evidence that showed he had consistently lied in his particulars of claim, witness statements and interviews with medical experts. The judge considered that the surveillance footage showed that the defendant had exaggerated his continuing disability (including his ability to walk, use of walking sticks, and ability to drive) and awarded him just £95,114. Following the award the insurers were granted permission to bring contempt proceedings and, after the court studied the surveillance, succeeded in proving twelve allegations of contempt to the required criminal standard of proof.

* Disclaimer: The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, express or implied.*

Get in touch

Call, email or use a contact form – whichever suits you. We’ll let you know the best person to help you get started.

Call or Email

020 7940 4060

No comments

Add your comment

We need your name and email address to make sure you’re a real person. We won’t share your email address with anyone else or send you spam. Please complete fields marked with *.

Leave a Reply

Your email address and phone number will not be published on the website. Other visitors will not be able to see your contact information. Required fields are marked *

Contact Us

How can we help?

Request a Call Back

How can we help?