Anthony Gold

Get in touch

020 7940 4060

  • People
  • Insights
  • What to Expect
  • Contact Us
Anthony Gold
  • Services
    • Housing And Property Disputes
      • Property Disputes
      • Leasehold Services
      • Services For Commercial Landlords, Tenants And Agents
      • Services For Residential Landlords And Agents
      • Housing And Tenancy Issues
      • Judicial Review
    • Injury And Medical Claims
      • Life Changing Injuries
      • Medical Claims
      • Personal Injury
      • Child Abuse
    • Family And Relationships
      • Starting Relationships
      • Ending Relationships
      • After Relationships End
      • Useful Contacts
      • Religious & Cultural Issues
      • Family Law FAQs
      • Family Dispute Resolution
      • Modern Families And Surrogacy Arrangements
    • Conveyancing, Property & Business Services
      • Business Agreements
      • Business Disagreements
      • Commercial Property
      • Commercial Property Disputes
      • Leasehold Services
      • Residential Property
    • Wills, Estates & Court Of Protection
      • Wills, Trusts And Estates
      • Claims Against Trusts And Estates
      • Capacity And Court Of Protection
    • Dispute Resolution & Employment Law
      • Personal Claims
      • Professional Negligence
      • Business Disagreements
      • Claims Against Trusts And Estates
      • Employment
    • People
    • Insights
    • What to Expect
    • Contact Us
  • Get in touch

    020 7940 4060

  • Housing and Property Disputes
  • Injury and Medical Claims
  • Family and Relationships
  • Conveyancing, Property & Business Services
  • Wills, Estates & Court of Protection
  • Dispute Resolution & Employment Law
  • Property disputes
  • Ownership disputes and shares in property
  • Challenging the decisions of councils and public bodies
  • Rights of way, boundaries, covenants and easements
  • Party wall disputes
  • Leasehold services
  • Lease extension
  • Collective enfranchisement
  • Service charge disputes
  • Repairs to leaseholds
  • Right to manage
  • Services for commercial landlords, tenants and agents
  • Breach of covenant
  • Forfeiture and recovery of possession
  • Dilapidations and failing to repair
  • Lease renewals
  • Services for residential landlords and agents
  • Regulatory issues
  • Repossession
  • Agents (including letting agreements)
  • Housing and tenancy issues
  • Repairs
  • Repossession and eviction
  • Rehousing and homelessness
  • Judicial review
  • Life changing injuries
  • Brain injury
  • Spinal cord injury
  • Amputation
  • Psychiatric injury
  • Fatal injuries and inquests
  • Medical claims
  • Surgical claims
  • Non-Surgical Claims
  • Birth injury
  • Child health and paediatrics
  • GP and primary care treatment
  • Private healthcare
  • Personal injury
  • Road traffic accidents
  • Accidents abroad
  • Accidents at work
  • Faulty products
  • Public liability and other accidents
  • Child abuse
  • Child abuse
  • Starting relationships
  • Pre nuptial agreements
  • Pre civil partnership and same sex relationship agreements
  • Cohabitation and living together agreements
  • Property ownership agreements
  • Ending relationships
  • Divorce and separation
  • Ending a civil partnership
  • Ending cohabitation
  • Agreeing child arrangements
  • Agreeing finance and assets
  • International arrangements
  • After relationships end
  • Abduction and leave to remove children
  • Changing and challenging parenting agreements
  • Changing and challenging financial agreements
  • Grandparents’ rights
  • Useful Contacts
  • Financial planners
  • Referral to Pension Actuaries and Pension on Divorce Experts (PODEs)
  • Tax Specialists
  • Financial Neutrals
  • Counselling
  • Conveyancing
  • Wills
  • Religious & cultural issues
  • Jewish family law
  • Islamic family law
  • Family Law FAQs
  • Children FAQs
  • Cohabitation Agreement FAQs
  • No-Fault Divorce and Separation FAQs
  • Financial Issues FAQs
  • Pre-Marital Contracts FAQs
  • Family Dispute Resolution
  • Roundtable Meetings
  • One Solicitor Solution
  • Mediation
  • Collaborative Practice
  • Arbitration
  • Second Opinions
  • Private FDR’s
  • Early Neutral Evaluation (‘ENE’)
  • Modern Families and Surrogacy Arrangements
  • Domestic Surrogacy
  • International Surrogacy
  • Business agreements
  • Business advice
  • Employment
  • Mergers and acquisitions
  • Supplier contracts
  • Business disagreements
  • Commercial property
  • Commercial Sale and Purchases
  • Commercial loans and mortgages
  • Property Investment: plot developers & plot buyers
  • Auction: sales and purchases
  • Commercial advice for landlords and tenants
  • Planning advice
  • Mortgage debentures and securities
  • Commercial property disputes
  • Breach of covenant
  • Dilapidations and failing to repair
  • Forfeiture and recovery of possession
  • Lease renewals
  • Leasehold services
  • Lease extension
  • Collective enfranchisement
  • Service charge disputes
  • Repairs to leaseholds
  • Right to manage
  • Residential property
  • Residential Sale and Purchases
  • Property Investment: plot developers & plot buyers
  • Remortgages
  • Auction: sales and purchases
  • Ownership matters and transfers
  • Wills, trusts and estates
  • Making a will
  • Applying for probate
  • Distributing the estate
  • Arranging lasting power of attorney
  • Trust advice
  • Tax planning and advice
  • Claims against trusts and estates
  • Contesting a will
  • Losses caused by trustees
  • Capacity and court of protection
  • Appointing a deputy
  • Removing a deputy
  • Arranging lasting power of attorney
  • Gifts and legacies
  • Managing assets under a deputyship
  • Care issues
  • Removing lasting and enduring power of attorney
  • Special educational needs
  • Capacity and court of protection
  • Personal claims
  • Debt recovery
  • Ownership disputes and shares in property
  • Civil and commercial mediation
  • Building disputes
  • Professional negligence
  • Professional Negligence
  • Property Fraud
  • Investment Fraud
  • Business disagreements
  • Building disputes
  • Civil and commercial mediation
  • Claims against directors
  • Contract disputes
  • Debt recovery
  • Directors personal liabilities
  • Employment
  • Professional negligence
  • Claims against trusts and estates
  • Contesting a will
  • Losses caused by trustees
  • Employment
  • Employment
  • Unfair or Wrongful Dismissal
  • Settlement Agreements
Anthony Gold > Blog > Can a will be rectified after a testator’s death?
Sarah Atkinson

Sarah Atkinson

sarah.atkinson@anthonygold.co.uk

Share
  • February 22, 2021
  • Blog
  • By  Sarah Atkinson 
  • 0 comments

Can a will be rectified after a testator’s death?


Under section 20 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982 (“the 1982 Act”), Courts have the power to rectify a will, following a testator’s death, if there is evidence that the will fails to carry out the testator’s intentions, because of a clerical error or a failure to understand the testator’s instructions.

An application for an order to rectify a will cannot, without permission of the Court, be made after 6 months of the date of the Grant of Probate.

In the case of Kelly v Brennan [2020] EWHC 245 (Ch) the Court considered whether to allow a claim for the rectification of a will which had been made 2 years and 11 months out of time. The court also had to consider where the testator was domiciled to determine which law was applicable.

Background

These proceedings concerned the estate of Mr Patrick Joseph Kelly. Mr Kelly was born in the Republic of Ireland. He was one of 9 children and moved to England in the early 1970s. He never married and had no children. Although he would occasionally visit his family in Ireland, the evidence was that he did not intend to return to live there.  Despite this, on 5 July 2010, Mr Kelly instructed a firm based in Ireland, R A Osborne & Son (RAO), to prepare a will on his behalf.

The solicitor’s handwritten note of the meeting records that his estate was to be divided into 6 equal shares between 5 of his surviving siblings and the 5 adult children of a further sister who had pre-deceased him. However, the will was drafted incorrectly. Under the will, his Estate was to be left to the same beneficiaries, but split into 10 equal shares. As a result of this error, the 5 surviving siblings would each receive over £100,000 less from the estate.

A claim was therefore brought by Mr Kelly’s brother, Vincent Kelly, for rectification of the 2010 will against the 5 adult children. The claim was opposed by 2 of the adult children.

Was there a clerical error in the 2010 will?

The claim for rectification in this case was put forward on the basis that there had been a clerical error. Lord Neuberger considered the meaning of ‘clerical error’ in the case of Marley v. Rawlings [2014] UKSC 2. He held that ‘clerical error’ could have a wider meaning, ‘namely a mistake arising out of office work of a relatively routine nature’, as opposed to a narrow meaning which would typically be limited to mistakes involved in copying or writing out a document.

In the case of Kelly, there was a clear differentiation between the solicitor’s handwritten attendance note recording Mr Kelly’s testamentary intentions and the wording of the will. Master Shuman was satisfied that the handwritten note was an accurate record of the instructions given by Mr Kelly when he prepared the will. He held that it was clear that this was a clerical error arising out of office work and that it is therefore a strong case for rectification of the will.

Where was Mr Kelly’s domicile at the date of his death?

The Defendants argued that the 1982 Act did not apply to the will because it had been made in Ireland and because Mr Kelly was not domiciled in England.

Mr Kelly‘s domicile of origin was the Republic of Ireland. However, on the evidence before the Court, Master Shuman found that Mr Kelly was domiciled in England both at the time of making the 2010 will and at the time of his death.

In considering which law should apply, Master Shuman found no specific treatment of rectification in the text that governs the position on the conflict of laws. In the absence of guidance, he held that it made “sense for the law of the deceased’s domicile to determine issues of essential validity and construction, in respect of movables, including this claim for rectification”. That being the case Master Shuman held that English law on rectification under the 1982 Act applied to the will.

Permission to Proceed Out of Time

The third issue that had to be decided by Master Shuman was whether to grant permission for the will to be rectified given that the claim had been issued 2 years and 11 months out of time.

In considering this issue, Master Shuman compared the Court’s approach to allowing applications to extend time under section 4 of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependents) Act 1975 (“the 1975 Act”). Master Shuman found that to simply align the guidelines from applications under the 1975 Act to applications to extend time under section 20 of the 1982 Act is to disregard the fundamentally different nature of these claims. This is because claims for the rectification of wills try to give effect to the testator’s true intentions. Whereas the effect of 1975 Act claims is to depart from the testator’s intentions. Accordingly, he found that a more flexible approach should be used in relation to claims for the rectification of wills.

Master Shuman considered that it was undoubtedly just and proper in the circumstances of this case to grant permission. In coming to this decision, Master Shuman found the fact that negotiations had taken place at the time that probate was granted, that there was an explanation for the delay in issuing the claim, there had been no distribution of the estate and that there was a strong case for rectification were all factors in favour of granting permission.

Summary

The case shows a growing willingness of the courts to intervene and correct errors in will drafting, following on from the Marley v. Rawlings case. In this case, the rectification in question involved a rewriting of the will based on factual evidence of intent, not merely correcting misleading wording arising from a clerical error. Furthermore, not only did the court allow the case to proceed out of time but the case also established that the courts can rectify foreign wills.

*Disclaimer: The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, express or implied.*

Sarah Atkinson

Sarah Atkinson

sarah.atkinson@anthonygold.co.uk

Get in touch

Call, email or use a contact form – whichever suits you. We’ll let you know the best person to help you get started.

Call or Email

020 7940 4060

mail@anthonygold.co.uk

No comments

Add your comment

We need your name and email address to make sure you’re a real person. We won’t share your email address with anyone else or send you spam. Please complete fields marked with *.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

code

Related Services

  • Ownership matters and transfers

  • Ownership disputes and shares in property

  • Distributing the estate

  • Contesting a will

  • Civil and commercial mediation

  • Changing and challenging financial agreements

About the author

  • Sarah Atkinson

Meet the team

  • Injury and Medical Claims

You might also like...

  • Capacity to Make a Will: The Golden Rule

Contact Us

Request a Call Back

About Us

  • Accessibility
  • Compliance
  • Responsible Business
  • Equality & Diversity
  • History
  • Our Beliefs
  • List of LLP members

Careers

  • Trainee Solicitors
  • Vacancies

Social Media

  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • View our YouTube channel

Online Payments

  • Payment page through Worldpay

Accredited by

Lexel Parctice
76000Award

Copyright © Anthony Gold Solicitors LLP. All rights reserved. Anthony Gold Solicitors LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC433560 and is authorised and regulated by the by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration Number 810601