Snap election slows reform of injury claims process

Theresa May’s decision to call a snap general election last week has disrupted the Government’s plans to “reform” the bringing of injury claims.
The government’s plan for changes to injury claims is to increase the small claims limit for road traffic cases to £5,000, to institute a tariff based system for whiplash damages, and to increase the small claims limit for all other claims to £2,000. The planned reforms were part of the Prison and Courts Bill which is yet to go before the House of Lords. The snap general election means that all parliamentary business must be concluded by 3 May 2017 and there is simply not enough time to do it, and thus the bill has been shelved (for the moment).
So, the Bill and the reforms must wait until the country has its say on their next government. The claimant sector has welcomed the delay hoping it gives a new government an opportunity to reconsider the proposed reforms and to file them away never to be pursued. There is no doubt the reforms will strip away a large part of the injury claims market raising major concerns for many firms.
Surprisingly the insurance industry has not reacted with significant opposition to the delay. This is most probably as they believe it gives them an opportunity to lobby the government on other areas of reform they would like the Bill to deal with, such as a change in the way the discount rate is calculated and Lord Jackson’s likely recommendation to extend fixed costs to higher value cases. They will see this an opportunity to deal with everything at the same time.
If the political pundits are correct and the Conservative government is re-elected it is likely that the delay will be short lived. It will be high on their agenda to push through the bill when parliamentary business resumes. The reforms are likely to proceed with gusto and may be more wide reaching than initially planned, to the significant disadvantage of injured people and their representatives.
In the meantime there will be significant uncertainty especially for catastrophic injury lawyers dealing with claims for significant future losses. The ongoing uncertainty about the discount rate is causing insurers to retreat from settlement negotiations in view of a potential change. What happens next is anyone’s guess.
* Disclaimer: The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, express or implied.*
Please note
The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, expressed or implied.
Our Latest Injury & Medical Claims Insights
- April 2, 2025
MJF V University Hospitals Birmingham [2024] – The “Holmesian Fallacy” And The Limits Of A Put To Proof Defence
- March 31, 2025
Pre-Existing Conditions in Psychiatric Personal Injury Claims
- March 26, 2025
Riding the Risk: Micromobility in Personal Injury
- March 18, 2025
The importance of support throughout the life of a claim
- February 19, 2025
Alternative Dispute Resolution in Litigation
- February 12, 2025
What does naming judges have to do with vulnerable claimants?
Latest Articles
View allContact us today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the commercial
& civil Dispute team today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Wills, Trusts
& Estates team today
Contact the Court of
Protection team today
Contact the Employment Law team today
Contact the Clinical Negligence team today
Contact the Family & Relationships team today
Contact the Personal Injury Claims team today
Contact the leasehold & Freehold team today
Contact the Corporate & Commercial team today
Contact the housing & disputes team
"*" indicates required fields