Fergus Wilson claim dismissed

An attempt by millionaire landlord Fergus Wilson to silence Danny Hyde, a YouTube vlogger, has been dismissed by the Court. Â Giles Peaker acted pro bono for Danny Hyde.
Danny Hyde had made a YouTube video about Fergus Wilson after Wilson’s letting policy was found to unlawfully racially discriminate. In the course of that video, Danny had called Fergus Wilson a couple of vulgar names. Wilson brought a claim against Danny for £10,000 damages to try to get him to take down or change the video, alleging it was in breach of the Malicious Communications Act.  Giles Peaker of Anthony Gold and counsel Gerard Clarke of Blackstone Chambers took up Danny’s defence, both acting pro bono.
At the Yeovil County Court on 31 January, with Danny represented by Gerard Clarke, Wilson’s claim was dismissed outright. The District Judge awarded £3,000 in pro bono costs against Wilson, to be paid to a pro bono legal charity.
Giles says “I’m delighted the claim was dismissed. It had no legal basis and was brought simply to threaten a young man who had said something that Fergus Wilson didn’t like. Danny Hyde was exercising his right to free expression, nothing more. The award of pro bono costs against Fergus Wilson will hopefully make clear that threatening people with baseless claims is no way to behave.”
* Disclaimer: The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, express or implied.*
Please note
The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, expressed or implied.

Our Latest Housing & Property Disputes Insights
- April 7, 2025
Retrofit works: Can I make my landlord retrofit my council home?
- February 13, 2025
RRO Reforms under the new Renters’ Rights Bill
- January 10, 2025
The Renters’ Rights Bill Explained: Key Provisions and Implications for Renters and Landlords
- December 23, 2024
Court of Appeal Decision in Martyna Switaj v Adrian McClenaghan – Can a valid section 21 notice be served if prohibited fees under the Tenant Fees Act 2019 have been taken prior to 1 June 2019?
- November 20, 2024
Trading Standards Penalty for Novation Fee Quashed on Appeal
- October 10, 2024
Terminating Licences to Occupy Residential Property: A Legal Guide
Latest Articles
View allContact us today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the commercial
& civil Dispute team today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Wills, Trusts
& Estates team today
Contact the Court of
Protection team today
Contact the Employment Law team today
Contact the Clinical Negligence team today
Contact the Family & Relationships team today
Contact the Personal Injury Claims team today
Contact the leasehold & Freehold team today
Contact the Corporate & Commercial team today
Contact the housing & disputes team
"*" indicates required fields