Stansfield v BBC

On 8 February 2013 Jem Stansfield a presenter of the BBC’s popular science programme Bang Goes the Theory, was injured whilst working as a presenter when, as part of a scripted programme examining whether child seats operated better forward or rear facing, he was filmed as a human crash test dummy in a go-kart which was crashed multiple times to simulate a car crash[1]. The engineering experts agreed that all the crash tests were conducted at a speed above the threshold generally considered to be safe and that conducting repeated tests over a short period of time is likely to have exacerbated the effect of any one test.
Liability was the subject of a prior agreement between the parties whereby the BBC agreed to be responsible for two-thirds of the damages awarded. After a trial to assess damages over 10 days in May and June this year, Mrs Justice Yip assessed damages, after the one-third deduction, at £1,617,286.20.
The Judge found that before the crash tests Mr Stansfield was “a high functioning individual, who worked hard in a job he loved and who was happy in his home life.” She found that in the crash tests he had sustained a mild traumatic brain injury, audio-vestibular damage[2], a whiplash injury to the spine and psychiatric injury. After the crash tests she found that he was “genuinely suffering a range of significant physical and emotional symptoms which mean that his life is substantially impoverished compared to the position before the crash tests.”
The judge heard a range of evidence from industry professionals. Mr Stansfield had a very rare set of skills, including presenting, engineering, producing and developing ideas and successful formats. He was an established presenter who had also worked behind the scenes for many years.
The matter was handled by David Marshall, Managing Partner at Anthony Gold. He specialises in brain and psychiatric personal injury claims. He is an APIL past president, honorary life member and fellow, a member and past chair of the Law Society’s Civil Justice Committee and a member of the Civil Procedure Rules Committee. Anthony Gold briefed barrister Marcus Grant of Temple Garden Chambers who appeared for Mr Stansfield at trial.
Press Enquiries contact:
Mumtaz Hussain at Anthony Gold Solicitors LLP on 07972 071543 or 020 7940 4032
msh@anthonygold.co.uk
[1] The speed was agreed for three of the tests to have been 11.5 mph and one at 8.5 mph, but as there was no effective crumple zone or other protections available to occupants of normal motor vehicle, the force of the impact in these ‘barrier collisions’ was equivalent to a vehicle-to-vehicle collision at up to twice the speed
[2] Left-sided damage including to gravitational and angular motion sensors which cause balance problems, migraine, some hearing processing difficulties, and tinnitus.
Please note
The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, expressed or implied.

Related Insights
- September 21, 2021
£825,000 Recovered for Injured Construction Worker
- September 17, 2021
The court’s role where a claimant does not have capacity
Our Latest Injury & Medical Claims Insights
- September 26, 2025
Intermediate track injury claims: the rise of early settlement offers
- August 26, 2025
Anthony Gold Solicitors welcome Helen Whittam as a new Support and Rehabilitation Coordinator in the Injury and Medical Claims Team
- August 19, 2025
Contributory negligence and children
- August 13, 2025
Video: From tragedy to triumph – Eliezer’s journey after a life-changing accident
- July 9, 2025
What is Contributory Negligence and How Could it Affect Your Claim?
- June 18, 2025
Hobson v Hammond and another [2025] – when is an omission to investigate symptoms illogical?
Latest Articles
View allGuide: September 26, 2025
Contact us today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the commercial
& civil Dispute team today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Wills, Trusts
& Estates team today
Contact the Court of
Protection team today
Contact the Employment Law team today
Contact the Clinical Negligence team today
Contact the Family & Relationships team today
Contact the Personal Injury Claims team today
Contact the leasehold & Freehold team today
Contact the Corporate & Commercial team today
Contact the housing & disputes team
"*" indicates required fields