Service Charge and Fire Safety Improvements

Nobody would dispute the importance of fire safety in buildings, particularly in blocks of flats.  The Lakanal House fire in Southwark, London in 2009, when six people died, was a reminder of how deadly fire can be. Landlords are under an obligation to carry out Fire Risk Assessments to their properties. Fire safety standards have changed and improved over time. Safety equipment and safety features like fire doors and escape routes, which were up to date when a block was built or last refurbished, can become out of date. Responsible landlords naturally want to ensure fire safety is to the most modern standards.
But then there is the question of who should pay for all this?  Landlords will want to pass on the cost to leaseholders through the service charge. Leaseholders though might want to look carefully at their leases to see if this is something that can really be passed on to them.  Almost all leases allow landlords to pass on the reasonable cost of repairs as service charge.  But fire safety works may not be repairs at all but may be improvements.  Does the lease allow the freeholder to charge for improvements?  If not, then the landlord will have to pay for the fire safety works.  Some leases also allow landlords to pass on as service charge expenses which arise out of statutory obligations.  That might catch the cost of fire risk assessments, but it might not catch the cost of some or all of the actual works themselves.
“Right to buy” leaseholders of local authorities amongst others are often charged substantial sums for fire safety improvements through service charge when this is not payable under the lease.  When the proposal to charge is made, leaseholders would be well advised to see whether they are really liable to pay.
*Disclaimer: The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, express or implied.*
Please note
The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, expressed or implied.

Speak to a member of the team
Our Latest Housing & Property Disputes Insights
- February 13, 2025
RRO Reforms under the new Renters’ Rights Bill
- January 10, 2025
The Renters’ Rights Bill Explained: Key Provisions and Implications for Renters and Landlords
- December 23, 2024
Court of Appeal Decision in Martyna Switaj v Adrian McClenaghan – Can a valid section 21 notice be served if prohibited fees under the Tenant Fees Act 2019 have been taken prior to 1 June 2019?
- November 20, 2024
Trading Standards Penalty for Novation Fee Quashed on Appeal
- October 10, 2024
Terminating Licences to Occupy Residential Property: A Legal Guide
- September 19, 2024
Will purpose-built student accommodation (PBSA) sector be exempt from the Renters’ Rights Bill?
Latest Articles
View allGuide: March 18, 2025
Contact us today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the commercial
& civil Dispute team today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Wills, Trusts
& Estates team today
Contact the Court of
Protection team today
Contact the Employment Law team today
Contact the Clinical Negligence team today
Contact the Family & Relationships team today
Contact the Personal Injury Claims team today
Contact the leasehold & Freehold team today
Contact the Corporate & Commercial team today
Contact the housing & disputes team
"*" indicates required fields