*Disclaimer: The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, express or implied.*
Fact-finding hearings in private children proceedings: an overview
Victoria Rylatt, Partner | Kim Beatson, Partner| Family & Relationships | August 13, 2020

In a recent article in New Law Journal Kim Beatson and Victoria Brown provide an overview on Fact-finding hearings in private children proceedings.
A ‘fact-finding hearing’ (FFH) is the first limb of a split hearing which is a hearing divided in to two parts. In the first half the court makes findings of fact on issues identified by the parties or the court and recorded in a Scott Schedule (precedents available from us if needed). During the second part the court decides the case based on the findings. Often there will be a clear and stark issue such as sexual or serious physical abuse or serious mental abuse such as controlling or coercive behaviour. However, this is not always the case. More recently, coercive and controlling behaviour has been deemed suitable for determination at a FFH. However, case law on this is still relatively limited. The CPS guidance gives 25 examples of what the police might investigate as part of coercive control allegations. Controlling and coercive does not fit comfortably within the format of a Scott Schedule given that it will usually be necessary to establish a pattern of behaviour, which may span a long period of time and involve more subtle behaviours which in isolation may not appear relevant. Practitioners acting for clients in cases involving allegations of domestic abuse must be familiar with Practice Direction 12J of the Family Procedure Rules 2010. Pursuant to this, the courts are required at the earliest possible stage in proceedings to identify whether there are issues of domestic abuse and to apply the requirements of the practice direction to the management of the case.
The full article was published on 24 July 2020 and can be found here.
Please note
The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, expressed or implied.

Related Insights
Our Latest Family & Relationships Insights
- January 21, 2026
How to value a business in divorce proceedings?
- December 11, 2025
A Divorced Christmas Carol: A story of reflection and change in 2025
- December 4, 2025
Risks of using AI platforms like ChatGPT in UK family law cases
- December 1, 2025
Tinsel, tensions, and time-sharing: Navigating child arrangements at Christmas
- November 22, 2025
Spousal Maintenance – Everything you need to know
- November 22, 2025
Prenuptial Agreements: The Pros and Cons
Latest Articles
View allInsights: January 27, 2026
Make a payment
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact us today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the commercial
& civil Dispute team today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Wills, Trusts
& Estates team today
Contact the Court of
Protection team today
Contact the Employment Law team today
Contact the Clinical Negligence team today
Contact the Family & Relationships team today
Contact the Personal Injury Claims team today
Contact the leasehold & Freehold team today
Contact the Corporate & Commercial team today
Contact the housing & disputes team
"*" indicates required fields































