Tube train victim receives rehabilitation

My client’s arm was caught in the door of a tube train at Notting Hill Station. The train moved off. Unable to free herself my client was dragged down the platform and into the tunnel where she was rescued by the emergency services from under the train.
At St Mary’s Hospital my client was treated for serious pelvic and lumbar fractures, as well as a de-gloving injury to her right leg. After a month’s stay she was discharged home with basic equipment to manage.
Within days of my instruction, I appointed a case manager and obtained funding to provide my client with professional carers and domestic support while she recovered. The hospital was slow to provide follow up care. The fixator on her right leg was still in situ and ready to come off but a date could not be offered for some time.
Ian Sinha, treating surgeon, was approached to perform the surgery in his private clinic and a date could be offered within a few weeks. Part of the fixator was removed; the femoral ring sitting on the upper leg which caused most discomfort. My client was then able to commence home-based private physiotherapy. While waiting for follow-up surgery, she also visited Lynden Hill Clinic for residential rehabilitation. Six weeks later the tibial ring was removed, again on a private basis and with funding provided through the claim.
My client continues to recover and is doing so during a second stay at Lynden Hill. Upon her return an occupational therapist will visit to assess the suitability of her home and make recommendations for aids, equipment and adaptations as needed.
The above is a good example of how funding can make a huge difference in a person’s rehabilitation from serious injury. It is not always possible, but I work hard to make sure provision is made where it is. This, I feel, undoubtedly makes for a better outcome overall.
* Disclaimer: The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, express or implied.*
Please note
The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, expressed or implied.
Related Guides
- March 29, 2018
£298,000 awarded to husband and wife following serious road traffic collision
- January 11, 2018
£100,000 agreed for negligent bladder injury
- October 25, 2017
£100,000 compensation for serious pelvis injury
Our Latest Injury & Medical Claims Insights
- April 2, 2025
MJF V University Hospitals Birmingham [2024] – The “Holmesian Fallacy” And The Limits Of A Put To Proof Defence
- March 31, 2025
Pre-Existing Conditions in Psychiatric Personal Injury Claims
- March 26, 2025
Riding the Risk: Micromobility in Personal Injury
- March 18, 2025
The importance of support throughout the life of a claim
- February 19, 2025
Alternative Dispute Resolution in Litigation
- February 12, 2025
What does naming judges have to do with vulnerable claimants?
Latest Articles
View allContact us today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the commercial
& civil Dispute team today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Wills, Trusts
& Estates team today
Contact the Court of
Protection team today
Contact the Employment Law team today
Contact the Clinical Negligence team today
Contact the Family & Relationships team today
Contact the Personal Injury Claims team today
Contact the leasehold & Freehold team today
Contact the Corporate & Commercial team today
Contact the housing & disputes team
"*" indicates required fields