The marriage that can’t be broken

Mr and Mrs Owen married in 1978 and had two children. They separated in February 2015 and Mrs Owen petitioned for divorce three months later. They are still married!
To prove the breakdown of a marriage, divorce petitions can refer to adultery, desertion, 2 years separation with consent, 5 years separation (when consent is withheld) and behaviour.
When a divorce is based on the respondent’s unreasonable behaviour the court hearing the petition for divorce should not hold the marriage to be broken down irretrievably unless the petitioner satisfies the court that the respondent has behaved in such a way that the petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with the respondent.
The original trial judge (Judge Tolson QC) was not satisfied that Mr Owens had behaved in such a way that Mrs Owens could not reasonably be expected to live with him. Mrs Owens’ divorce was refused despite the judge finding that the marriage was over.
Mrs Owen appealed and the matter came before the President of the Family Division, Sir James Munby, who said “It is not a ground for divorce that you find yourself in a wretchedly unhappy marriage though some people say that it should be”. He found that Judge Tolson QC, had correctly applied the law even if the result was desperately unfair to Mrs Owen.
The Supreme Court judgment was issued on 25 July and Mrs Owen’s appeal was refused.
The decision reaffirmed that it was for the court (and not Mrs Owens) to assess if it was reasonable for her to continue living with Mr Owens.
The Owens case is one of only a tiny proportion of divorces which are defended. However, everyone recognised that a reform of the divorce system is long overdue and that exaggerating a respondent’s behaviour or choosing particularly offensive examples of behaviour, is undignified and bad for children. Like the Court of Appeal below, the Supreme Court made it clear that law reform is not their remit and Parliament is responsible for change.
Please note
The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, expressed or implied.
Our Latest Family & Relationships Insights
- September 16, 2025
Virtual hearings in Family Law: How to prepare & present yourself
- August 22, 2025
How do you legally end a civil partnership?
- August 22, 2025
How English judges decide the finances on divorce – and what Standish v Standish means for you
- August 21, 2025
What are the legal implications of digital abuse in family law in the UK?
- August 20, 2025
Transfer of Children to Father
- August 20, 2025
Post-Nups vs Settlement Agreements: The Battle for a Clean Break in PN v SA [2025] EWFC 141
Latest Articles
View allGuide: October 3, 2025
Guide: October 3, 2025
Contact us today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the commercial
& civil Dispute team today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Wills, Trusts
& Estates team today
Contact the Court of
Protection team today
Contact the Employment Law team today
Contact the Clinical Negligence team today
Contact the Family & Relationships team today
Contact the Personal Injury Claims team today
Contact the leasehold & Freehold team today
Contact the Corporate & Commercial team today
Contact the housing & disputes team
"*" indicates required fields