Local Elections and the Private Rented Sector

The local elections have seen the two main parties losing substantial numbers of councillors and control of a number of councils.
At the time of writing the Conservatives have lost control of 48 councils while Labour has lost 2. Meanwhile the Liberal Democrats have gained 10, Residents Associations 1, and Independents 3. Meanwhile the number of councils that have moved to No Overall Control has increased by 29.
There are a number of reasons for these results, unsurprisingly including dissatisfaction with the current Brexit situation. However, another key reason that seems to have led to a lot of victories, especially among independents is that the main parties are not seen as focusing on key local issues such as housing.
So what will this mean for the PRS? Well there are already a number of local authorities that have licensing schemes in place for the rental sector, whether that involves licensing more HMOs than the mandatory licensing scheme requires or selective licensing of all landlords.
However, it is true to say that Conservative controlled councils are less likely to favour substantial licensing schemes. However, Liberal Democrat councils certainly do and councils controlled by independents with a focus on local issues may see licensing as a means to deal with perceived housing issues.
Therefore, one of the effects of the local elections may be a further drive for more additional and selective licensing schemes. Additional schemes do not require permission from the Secretary of State but selective licensing schemes that affect more than 20% of the geographic area controlled by a council or more than 20% of all PRS properties do need consent. It is doubtful whether that permission will be forthcoming but that means there is substantial scope for greater HMO licensing and more selective licensing, at least on a local basis.
*Disclaimer: The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, express or implied.*
Please note
The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, expressed or implied.
Related Insights
- May 2, 2019
Overclaiming
- April 24, 2019
Private: Amsterdam’s buy-to-let ban unlikely to ‘substantially affect pricing’ on its own
- April 24, 2019
The 5th Money Laundering Directive and Property Agency
Our Latest Housing & Property Disputes Insights
- September 26, 2025
How will the Renters’ Rights Bill affect tenancies with very high rent?
- September 24, 2025
Leaseholder vs Freeholder repairs – who is responsible for what?
- September 15, 2025
Understanding service charges and service charge demands
- August 20, 2025
Rent increases after the Renters’ Rights Bill: What landlords need to know
- August 15, 2025
Shared Ownership Flats – Who does the repairs?
- August 15, 2025
Protection from eviction: The basics
Latest Articles
View allGuide: September 26, 2025
Guide: September 26, 2025
Guide: September 24, 2025
Contact us today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the commercial
& civil Dispute team today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Wills, Trusts
& Estates team today
Contact the Court of
Protection team today
Contact the Employment Law team today
Contact the Clinical Negligence team today
Contact the Family & Relationships team today
Contact the Personal Injury Claims team today
Contact the leasehold & Freehold team today
Contact the Corporate & Commercial team today
Contact the housing & disputes team
"*" indicates required fields