How do you overturn a caveat at the Probate Registry?

When there is a dispute as to the validity of a will or as to who should apply for a Grant, a person may lodge a caveat at the Probate Registry. As explained in our earlier article,  caveat stops anyone from applying for a Grant.
A caveat is entered for 6 months. It may, however, be extended an innumerable number of times. A person wishing to apply for a Grant may choose to wait out the 6 months period in the hope that the person who entered the caveat (the caveator) will fail to extend their caveat and they will be able to apply for a Grant then.  Otherwise, when the reasons for entering the caveat are believed to be unreasonable or unjustified, the proposed executor or administrator may challenge the caveat by issuing a warning.
The warning is another form on which the person issuing it must state their interest in the estate. The warning is served on the caveator. No fee is required, but the issue of costs must be kept in mind. The person issuing the warning must bear in mind there may be legal complexities that arise in doing so. There is also the risk of being ordered to pay the caveator’s legal costs if a dispute follows the warning and is lost by the person who issued it.
Once the warning has been served, the caveator has only fourteen days to file a response. If no response is filed, the caveat ceases to have an effect and a Grant may be issued.
The caveator who decides to respond may do so by withdrawing the caveat or contesting the warning. The latter is done by entering an appearance. The appearance is not a physical appearance, but the submission of a legal document to the Probate Registry. Once the appearance is entered, it remains in force until the dispute is resolved. The dispute may be resolved by parties reaching an agreement or seeking a resolution from the court.
To read more on the procedures of entering a caveat or appearance please see our related blogs on Caveats and appearance or contact us for advice.
To read our blog in Polish please click here.
* Disclaimer: The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, express or implied.*
Please note
The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, expressed or implied.

Speak to a member of the team
Our Latest Commercial & Civil Dispute Resolution Insights
- January 6, 2025
Understanding Capacity to Litigate and the Civil Justice Council’s Proposals
- December 18, 2024
Landmark Decision: Hirachand v Hirachand and the Recoverability of Success Fees
- November 6, 2024
Anthony Gold Solicitors successful in Beddoe Application
- June 7, 2024
Can a minor child or somebody who lacks mental capacity bring a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975?
- June 3, 2024
What happens to partnership assets following dissolution?
- May 31, 2024
Hirachand v Hirachand: Conditional Fee Agreements in Inheritance Act ClaimsÂ
Latest Articles
View allGuide: March 18, 2025
Contact us today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the commercial
& civil Dispute team today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Wills, Trusts
& Estates team today
Contact the Court of
Protection team today
Contact the Employment Law team today
Contact the Clinical Negligence team today
Contact the Family & Relationships team today
Contact the Personal Injury Claims team today
Contact the leasehold & Freehold team today
Contact the Corporate & Commercial team today
Contact the housing & disputes team
"*" indicates required fields