Compensation for injury sustained after a fall from a ladder at work

Accidents at work, especially those in the construction industry are unfortunately all too common. Often short cuts are taken by both employers and employees to save time and money, but of course when things go wrong, it can have a devastating impact on the injured person. In some cases it means that they are not able to return to their previous occupation.
I recently settled a case for a client who was injured whilst descending a ladder. He had been repairing a roof, but was on his way down for a short break.  The ladder slid and he fell, landing on his right foot. The ladder in question was not suitable; it was too large for the job in question and had no grips. In addition, there had not been adequate scaffolding around the building.
Whilst my client had no difficulty establishing primary liability against the company he had worked for, he had to accept that he was also partly to blame for his failure to ensure the ladder was secure. However, the percentage reduction for contributory negligence against my client could not be agreed. Proceedings were issued and interim payments obtained to fund treatment.
The injuries suffered by my client were life-changing. He sustained a complicated fracture dislocation of his right ankle and subsequently underwent four surgical procedures. These included an open reduction and internal fixation; arthroscopic debridement of the joint; arthrodesis; and revision arthrodesis. It is likely that my client will require further surgery due to non-union of the fracture. He was not able to return work as a roofer. Understandably, my client suffered from severe depression relating to his constant pain and restricted mobility as well as inability to work and required counselling.
After a lengthy legal battle, the claim settled by consent for hundreds of thousands of pounds. My client, with the benefit of hindsight, wishes he had done things differently and taken the time to ensure the ladder was secure as this would have prevented the accident. He was nevertheless happy to have settled the claim, as he can now concentrate on his future.
Please note
The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, expressed or implied.
Our Latest Injury & Medical Claims Insights
- May 12, 2025
The Electronic Patient Record And Clinical Negligence Claims
- April 2, 2025
MJF V University Hospitals Birmingham [2024] – The “Holmesian Fallacy” And The Limits Of A Put To Proof Defence
- March 31, 2025
Pre-Existing Conditions in Psychiatric Personal Injury Claims
- March 26, 2025
Riding the Risk: Micromobility in Personal Injury
- March 18, 2025
The importance of support throughout the life of a claim
- February 19, 2025
Alternative Dispute Resolution in Litigation
Latest Articles
View allContact us today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the commercial
& civil Dispute team today
"*" indicates required fields
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Conveyancing team today
Contact the Wills, Trusts
& Estates team today
Contact the Court of
Protection team today
Contact the Employment Law team today
Contact the Clinical Negligence team today
Contact the Family & Relationships team today
Contact the Personal Injury Claims team today
Contact the leasehold & Freehold team today
Contact the Corporate & Commercial team today
Contact the housing & disputes team
"*" indicates required fields